On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 05:25:35AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:50:25AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:12:00AM +0200, Soren Hansen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 04:40:41PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > It turns out tha
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:50:25AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:12:00AM +0200, Soren Hansen wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 04:40:41PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > It turns out that the general migration strategy I defined[1] in
> > > reference to Xen,
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:12:00AM +0200, Soren Hansen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 04:40:41PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > It turns out that the general migration strategy I defined[1] in
> > reference to Xen, ie. the 3 steps of Prepare/Perform/Finish, isn't
> > sufficient to support K
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 04:40:41PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> It turns out that the general migration strategy I defined[1] in
> reference to Xen, ie. the 3 steps of Prepare/Perform/Finish, isn't
> sufficient to support KVM migration.
[...]
What ever happened to this? Is it being worked on
