Re: [libvirt] ULLONG_MAX undeclared

2008-06-25 Thread Alexandre Hocquel
Thank you for the quick reply. - "Daniel P. Berrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fedora at least the definition is surrounded by a __USE_ISOC99. > I'm > not sure why that would work with Fedora but not with Debian. What > version > of GLibc and GCC is used on Debian Etch ? gcc -v Using

Re: [libvirt] ULLONG_MAX undeclared

2008-06-25 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 06:01:10PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I subscribed today on the list because I have a compilation problem of > libvirt 0.4.2 and 0.4.3 (didn't try the other versions). > I'm trying to compile libvirt on a Debian Etch with Xen 3.2.0 (also tried > with a 3.2.

[libvirt] ULLONG_MAX undeclared

2008-06-25 Thread a . hocquel
Hi, I subscribed today on the list because I have a compilation problem of libvirt 0.4.2 and 0.4.3 (didn't try the other versions). I'm trying to compile libvirt on a Debian Etch with Xen 3.2.0 (also tried with a 3.2.1) Every time I have this mistake: storage_conf.c: In function 'virStorageSize