Re: [libvirt] dynamic scsi disk attach seems to be broken in qemu(-kvm)-0.11, libvirt-0.7.1

2009-10-09 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:57:55PM -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote: Now, all of that said, it is actually possible to hot-add a second scsi device. However, as far as I can tell, this method is not yet supported by libvirt. It looks to me that with modern qemu, you have to do it this way:

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [libvirt] dynamic scsi disk attach seems to be broken in qemu(-kvm)-0.11, libvirt-0.7.1

2009-10-09 Thread Anthony Liguori
I would like some advice on how to proceed with this bug, and where the solution lies...in qemu or in libvirt. Ultimately, I would like the behavior we had in our previous release with kvm-84 and libvirt-0.6.1, where we could dynamically add scsi devices without a problem, using: pci_add 1

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [libvirt] dynamic scsi disk attach seems to be broken in qemu(-kvm)-0.11, libvirt-0.7.1

2009-10-09 Thread Dustin Kirkland
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote: I would like some advice on how to proceed with this bug, and where the solution lies...in qemu or in libvirt.  Ultimately, I would like the behavior we had in our previous release with kvm-84 and libvirt-0.6.1, where

Re: [libvirt] dynamic scsi disk attach seems to be broken in qemu(-kvm)-0.11, libvirt-0.7.1

2009-10-09 Thread Dustin Kirkland
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:57:55PM -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote: Now, all of that said, it is actually possible to hot-add a second scsi device. However, as far as I can tell, this method is not yet supported by

[libvirt] dynamic scsi disk attach seems to be broken in qemu(-kvm)-0.11, libvirt-0.7.1

2009-10-08 Thread Dustin Kirkland
We're experiencing what we believe to be a regression in qemu-kvm-0.11 and libvirt-0.7.0, from previous versions of kvm-84 and libvirt-0.6.1: Dynamically attaching sdb (a second scsi disk) fails. (Note that I have tested this against libvirt-0.7.1 built from source as well--same results.) Here