On 09/14/2011 02:20 PM, Thomas Treutner wrote:
complete JVM crashes - http://pastebin.com/jT6sXubu
With this message on the CLI:
java: tpp.c:63: __pthread_tpp_change_priority: Assertion `new_prio == -1
|| (new_prio = __sched_fifo_min_prio new_prio =
__sched_fifo_max_prio)' failed.
--
On 09/16/2011 10:16 AM, Thomas Treutner wrote:
On 09/14/2011 02:20 PM, Thomas Treutner wrote:
complete JVM crashes - http://pastebin.com/jT6sXubu
With this message on the CLI:
java: tpp.c:63: __pthread_tpp_change_priority: Assertion `new_prio == -1
|| (new_prio = __sched_fifo_min_prio
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:20:46PM +0200, Thomas Treutner wrote:
Hi,
this is kind of a follow-up to an older question/discussion:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-July/msg00267.html
As a result of that, I use a second thread for monitoring the live
migration, taking
On 09/16/2011 10:44 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:20:46PM +0200, Thomas Treutner wrote:
Of course, in my monitoring thread I'm checking in every monitoring
iteration if the domain object is not null, is still active, if the
jobInfo is available yet etc. But, as I can
Hi,
this is kind of a follow-up to an older question/discussion:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-July/msg00267.html
As a result of that, I use a second thread for monitoring the live
migration, taking actions (setting maxdowntime to a value that fits the
situation) if
