Re: [libvirt] libvirt/dnsmasq integration.

2010-03-01 Thread Simon Kelley
Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> The total set of DNSMASQ args that we currently use are >>> >>> --strict-order >>> --bind-interfaces >>> --domain DOMAIN-NAME(optional) >>> --pid-file=/var/run/libvirt/network/$NETWORK.pid >>> --conf-file= >>> --listen-address=IPADDR-OF-BRIDGE

Re: [libvirt] libvirt/dnsmasq integration.

2010-03-01 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 01:54:44PM +, Simon Kelley wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > I imagine you've already seen this, but as an example of the ARGV that > > libvirt generates for its dnsmasq instances: > > > > /usr/sbin/dnsmasq \ > >--strict-order \ > >--bind-inter

Re: [libvirt] libvirt/dnsmasq integration.

2010-03-01 Thread Simon Kelley
Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 04:37:04PM +, Simon Kelley wrote: >> Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:34:53PM +, Simon Kelley wrote: >>> [...] Does that make sense? It's a long and involved explanation to come to cold. I fear I may hav

Re: [libvirt] libvirt/dnsmasq integration.

2010-03-01 Thread Simon Kelley
Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > I imagine you've already seen this, but as an example of the ARGV that > libvirt generates for its dnsmasq instances: > > /usr/sbin/dnsmasq \ >--strict-order \ >--bind-interfaces \ >--pid-file=/var/run/libvirt/network/default.pid \ >--

Re: [libvirt] libvirt/dnsmasq integration.

2010-03-01 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 04:37:04PM +, Simon Kelley wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:34:53PM +, Simon Kelley wrote: > > [...] > >> Does that make sense? It's a long and involved explanation to come to > >> cold. I fear I may have over-simplified what libvir

Re: [libvirt] libvirt/dnsmasq integration.

2010-03-01 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:34:53PM +, Simon Kelley wrote: > As the principal maintainer of dnsmasq, I'm seeing increasing reports of > problems on systems which run both dnsmasq and libvirt. I'm fairly sure > I understand what's going on in these cases, and I have a few proposals > for chang

Re: [libvirt] libvirt/dnsmasq integration.

2010-02-24 Thread Simon Kelley
Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:34:53PM +, Simon Kelley wrote: > [...] >> Does that make sense? It's a long and involved explanation to come to >> cold. I fear I may have over-simplified what libvirt is doing with >> dnsmasq, in which case please enlighten me and I'll

Re: [libvirt] libvirt/dnsmasq integration.

2010-02-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:34:53PM +, Simon Kelley wrote: [...] > Does that make sense? It's a long and involved explanation to come to > cold. I fear I may have over-simplified what libvirt is doing with > dnsmasq, in which case please enlighten me and I'll modify my scheme to > take tha

[libvirt] libvirt/dnsmasq integration (formatting fixed).

2010-02-24 Thread Simon Kelley
(apologies for first attempt: I was using a strange mailer.) As the principal maintainer of dnsmasq, I'm seeing increasing reports of problems on systems which run both dnsmasq and libvirt. I'm fairly sure I understand what's going on in these cases, and I have a few proposals for changes in libv

[libvirt] libvirt/dnsmasq integration.

2010-02-24 Thread Simon Kelley
As the principal maintainer of dnsmasq, I'm seeing increasing reports of problems on systems which run both dnsmasq and libvirt. I'm fairly sure I understand what's going on in these cases, and I have a few proposals for changes in libvir and dnsmasq that should fix things. The problem is that