On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 08:28:27AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:22:50AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 05:23:27AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:46:11AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Does
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:22:50AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 05:23:27AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:46:11AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anyone know what the current status of Linux VServer support is?
> > > Las
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 05:23:27AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:46:11AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know what the current status of Linux VServer support is?
> > Last message I can find is a patch for it, which didn't make it into
> > libvirt:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:46:11AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Does anyone know what the current status of Linux VServer support is?
> Last message I can find is a patch for it, which didn't make it into
> libvirt:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2007-October/msg00273.html
Does anyone know what the current status of Linux VServer support is?
Last message I can find is a patch for it, which didn't make it into
libvirt:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2007-October/msg00273.html
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com