Hi,
one of the seems to fail on our build system, vircgrouptest fails with
Unexpected: nodeGetCPUCount() yields: -1
The test runs fine locally.
Here are the contents from testsuite.log with VIR_TEST_DEBUG=1 enabled.
See tests/test-suite.log
Please report to libvir-list@redhat.com
==
On 24.02.2016 21:36, Florian Hubold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one of the seems to fail on our build system, vircgrouptest fails with
> Unexpected: nodeGetCPUCount() yields: -1
>
> The test runs fine locally.
> Here are the contents from testsuite.log with VIR_TEST_DEBUG=1 enabled.
>
>
> See tests/test-s
On 25.02.2016 07:25, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 24.02.2016 21:36, Florian Hubold wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> one of the seems to fail on our build system, vircgrouptest fails with
>> Unexpected: nodeGetCPUCount() yields: -1
>>
>> The test runs fine locally.
>> Here are the contents from testsuite.log wit
Am 25.02.2016 um 07:25 schrieb Michal Privoznik:
> On 24.02.2016 21:36, Florian Hubold wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> one of the seems to fail on our build system, vircgrouptest fails with
>> Unexpected: nodeGetCPUCount() yields: -1
>>
>> The test runs fine locally.
>> Here are the contents from testsuite.log
On 25.02.2016 19:50, Florian Hubold wrote:
> Am 25.02.2016 um 07:25 schrieb Michal Privoznik:
>> On 24.02.2016 21:36, Florian Hubold wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> one of the seems to fail on our build system, vircgrouptest fails with
>>> Unexpected: nodeGetCPUCount() yields: -1
>>>
>>> The test runs fine
Am 26.02.2016 um 11:49 schrieb Michal Privoznik:
> On 25.02.2016 19:50, Florian Hubold wrote:
>> Am 25.02.2016 um 07:25 schrieb Michal Privoznik:
>>> On 24.02.2016 21:36, Florian Hubold wrote:
Hi,
one of the seems to fail on our build system, vircgrouptest fails with
Unexpected:
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 18:54 +0100, Florian Hubold wrote:
> Thanks for the previous fix, can I apply this also on top of v1.2.9-maint
> branch
> or does it require some subsequent commits from HEAD?
The fix is self-contained enough that you shouldn't have any
problem applying it on top of the v1.2
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 19:15 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 18:54 +0100, Florian Hubold wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the previous fix, can I apply this also on top of v1.2.9-maint
> > branch
> > or does it require some subsequent commits from HEAD?
> The fix is self-contained