On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 07:26:09AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 19.07.2013 04:04, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Dave Allan dal...@redhat.com wrote:
I've seen a bunch of interest in python3 [1,2,3]. Has anybody started
thinking about python3 bindings
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 02:13:59PM -0400, Dave Allan wrote:
I've seen a bunch of interest in python3 [1,2,3]. Has anybody started
thinking about python3 bindings for libvirt?
I'm not going to do any work on it, but I have two requirements here
- We should not end up maintaining two separate
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 02:13:59PM -0400, Dave Allan wrote:
I've seen a bunch of interest in python3 [1,2,3]. Has anybody started
thinking about python3 bindings for libvirt?
I'm not going to do any work on it, but I have
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 02:13:59PM -0400, Dave Allan wrote:
I've seen a bunch of interest in python3 [1,2,3]. Has anybody started
thinking about python3 bindings for libvirt?
Dave
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Python3
[2] https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/Python3Porting
[3] https
[1,2,3]. Has anybody started
thinking about python3 bindings for libvirt?
While not really answering your question, I would like to see the
build system a little more flexible with regards to Python binding
generation. Currently you have to configure libvirt and it will
generate
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Dave Allan dal...@redhat.com wrote:
I've seen a bunch of interest in python3 [1,2,3]. Has anybody started
thinking about python3 bindings for libvirt?
While not really answering your question, I would like to see the
build system a little more flexible
On 19.07.2013 04:04, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Dave Allan dal...@redhat.com wrote:
I've seen a bunch of interest in python3 [1,2,3]. Has anybody started
thinking about python3 bindings for libvirt?
While not really answering your question, I would like to see
