2008/9/4 Daniel Veillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 06:09:43PM +0200, atif bajwa wrote:
Just quick question,
what version of Xen/XenApi is packaged in RHEL 5.1/5.2. Can I remotely
access it using XML-RPC API or not?
RHEL-5.2 has xen-3.0.3, and that will stay the same for
Hi, Alain
I guess Daniel says xend issue.(since it relates to XenAPI)
As for hypervisor, You are correct in RHEL5.2 and CentOS5.2.
Current RHEL/Xen is very complex compared to upstream Xen.
Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI
Alain Barthe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/9/4 Daniel Veillard [EMAIL
So the question is,
Is there any particular reason that RHEL 5.2 did not upgrade Xen user space
tools/libs. Novell SLES/SLED 10 SP2 and Oracle VM 2.1.x have upgraded the
user space libs for remote management of Xen infrastructure.
Regards,
Atif
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Atsushi SAKAI
atif bajwa wrote:
So the question is,
Is there any particular reason that RHEL 5.2 did not upgrade Xen user
space tools/libs. Novell SLES/SLED 10 SP2 and Oracle VM 2.1.x have
upgraded the user space libs for remote management of Xen infrastructure.
Yes. We needed to keep backwards
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:56:49AM +0100, atif bajwa wrote:
So the question is,
Is there any particular reason that RHEL 5.2 did not upgrade Xen user space
tools/libs.
Yes that's called API and ABI compatibility in a RHEL product lifetime!
And by definition this will remain for all RHEL 5,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:56:49AM +0100, atif bajwa wrote:
So the question is,
Is there any particular reason that RHEL 5.2 did not upgrade Xen user space
tools/libs. Novell SLES/SLED 10 SP2 and Oracle VM 2.1.x have upgraded the
user space libs for remote management of Xen infrastructure.
Thanks,
With Xen 3.3, the Xen Client Initiative (XCI) is out, a Xen.org community
effort to accelerate and coordinate the development of fast, free,
compatible embedded Xen hypervisors for laptops, PCs and PDAs.
Don't you think the XenApi or similar technologies be right choice for
remote
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 01:49:53PM +0100, atif bajwa wrote:
Thanks,
With Xen 3.3, the Xen Client Initiative (XCI) is out, a Xen.org community
effort to accelerate and coordinate the development of fast, free,
compatible embedded Xen hypervisors for laptops, PCs and PDAs.
Don't you think the
Hi, Atif
If you want to natively use Xen API,
I will recommend to use it directly.
If you want to use archtecture neutral API,
You should use libvirt.
Libvirt pros and cons
pros:any Xen version is supported (like 3.y.z or 2.y)
cons:architecuture neutral API. specific functionality is not always
Thanks,
Please guide me list of supported distributions with versions that I can use
libvirt with.
Regards,
Atif
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Atsushi SAKAI [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi, Atif
If you want to natively use Xen API,
I will recommend to use it directly.
If you want to use
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 10:59:09AM +0200, atif bajwa wrote:
I am looking to integrate the Xen Management. Please guide me advantages of
using libvirt over XenAPI and please list xen-based-hypervisor
distributions(versions) that will be supported with libvirt. And what is
future of libvirt as
Thanks,
You mentioned that libvirt works with every version of Xen 3.0.x or later,
if you can list me list of Linux distros or verify if following list if ok
with remote access.
1. Solaris SPARC 81/9/10
2. Solaris x64/x86 9/10
3. Red Hat RHEL AS/ES/WS 3/4/5
4. Novell SUSE SLES 8/9/10
Regards,
Thanks but does libvirt support windows port with any released build or not?
I am little surprised should be?. I need to make a decision to use libvirt
or Xen API, (clearly runnable from windows) . If libvirt does windows port,
which of the following distributions are supported as remote hosts.
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 01:58:09PM +0200, atif bajwa wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
To address another point, we'll have better support for Windows in
future (ie. you won't need to build it from source). The dependency
is this project:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 02:40:38PM +0200, atif bajwa wrote:
2. List of distributions supported by libvirt as server. The list refers to
this part of question.
This part doesn't make sense. There is no hypervisor support in RHEL
3 or 4 (for example) so running libvirtd on RHEL 3 or 4 may be
Yes, you are correct for RHEL 3 but Xen 3.x is download-able for RHEL 4.1,
4.4, 4.5, 5, 5.1, 5.2 and similarly for Novell SLES 9.2, 9.3, 10, 10 SP1, 10
SP2 and OpenSUSE 10, 10.3, 11
Additionally, I got similar information from Sun xVM Ops Center managed
systems which integrates libvirt.
16 matches
Mail list logo
