On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 05:29:28PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:42:01PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:17:13PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 03:52:49PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > The loa
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:42:01PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:17:13PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 03:52:49PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > The load_drv() method there is to allow the plugin implementation
> > > to block it
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:17:13PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 03:52:49PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > The load_drv() method there is to allow the plugin implementation
> > to block its use with a libvirtd that is too old. eg, say we add
> > a new API 'foo', a
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 03:52:49PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The load_drv() method there is to allow the plugin implementation
> to block its use with a libvirtd that is too old. eg, say we add
> a new API 'foo', and the plugin implements that API. It wants to
> block its use in any libvir
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 03:01:01PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> [Resurrecting this old thread which has just been brought to my attention]
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >
> > typedef struct _virLockManagerDriver virLockManagerDriver;
> > typedef v
[Resurrecting this old thread which has just been brought to my attention]
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> typedef struct _virLockManagerDriver virLockManagerDriver;
> typedef virLockManagerDriver *virLockManagerDriverPtr;
>
> /* Which callbacks are suppor
