On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 00:29:14 +, Zhangbo (Oscar) wrote:
> Hi all:
> As we know, "32768~61000" are random ports reserved for
> customized use. 49152-49215 is in that range. We think that
> setting migration port into this range, is a little risky. Because
> other applications
Hi all:
As we know, "32768~61000" are random ports reserved for customized use.
49152-49215 is in that range.
We think that setting migration port into this range, is a little
risky. Because other applications may have already taken these ports before we
migrate a guest, then the m
