On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:29:00PM +0200, Jérémie Tarot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/5/24 Daniel P. Berrange
>
> > ...
> >
> > And new bridging modes would be
> >
> >> mode='bridge-brctl|vepa|private|passthru|bridge-macvtap'/>
> >
>
> VDE ? Openvswitch ?
I would be very happy to push openvswitc
I'll send a separate email (in a new thread, so it doesn't get lost! ;-)
with a new draft of what the network XML should look like, but wanted to
respond to Dan's comments inline...
On 05/24/2011 10:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 04:12:55PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
Hi,
2011/5/24 Daniel P. Berrange
> ...
>
> And new bridging modes would be
>
>mode='bridge-brctl|vepa|private|passthru|bridge-macvtap'/>
>
VDE ? Openvswitch ?
Thanks in advance
JT
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 04:12:55PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> Okay, here's a brief description of what I *think* will work. I'll
> build up the RNG based on this pseudo-xml:
>
>
> For the definition in the guest XML, the main change
> will be that will be valid (but
> optional) when interface
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 01:37:25PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 03:28:30PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > Sorry for hijacking the thread for something more general than vnlink:
> >
> >
> > It just occured to me today that the concept of virtual network should
> > b
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 03:28:30PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> Sorry for hijacking the thread for something more general than vnlink:
>
>
> It just occured to me today that the concept of virtual network should
> be used also in the section. Currently, if you specify
> you make the domain pr
Sorry for hijacking the thread for something more general than vnlink:
It just occured to me today that the concept of virtual network should
be used also in the section. Currently, if you specify
you make the domain practically
unmigratable.
There should be a method to specify a simbolic netw
Inline...
> -Original Message-
> From: libvir-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:libvir-list-
> boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Oved Ourfalli
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 1:15 AM
> To: Laine Stump; libvir-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [libvirt] migra
09:29 AM, Oved Ourfalli wrote:
See my comments below.
Thank you,
Oved
This is very useful, Oved! Thanks for the replies.
- Original Message -
From: "Laine Stump"
To: libvir-list@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 3:45:50 PM
Subject: Re: [libvirt] migration of vnlink VMs
On
See my comments below.
Thank you,
Oved
- Original Message -
> From: "Laine Stump"
> To: libvir-list@redhat.com
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 3:45:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [libvirt] migration of vnlink VMs
> On 04/28/2011 04:15 AM, Oved Ourfalli wrote:
> >&g
On 04/28/2011 04:15 AM, Oved Ourfalli wrote:
From: "Laine Stump"
Laine, hello.
We read your proposal for abstraction of guest<--> host network
connection in libvirt.
You has an open issue there regarding the vepa/vnlink attributes:
"3) What about the parameters in the element that are
current
- Original Message -
> From: "Laine Stump"
> To: "Oved Ourfalli"
> Cc: "Ayal Baron" , "Barak Azulay" ,
> "Shahar Havivi" ,
> "Itamar Heim" , "Dan Kenigsberg"
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:20:35 AM
> Subject: Re: migration of vnlink VMs
> Oved,
>
> Would it be okay to repost thi
12 matches
Mail list logo
