On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:05:40PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/15/2013 05:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:27:03AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 11:46 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/11/2013 07:23 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu,
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:35:29PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/15/2013 06:14 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
On 04/15/2013 04:09 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/15/2013 06:29 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:46:15AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/11/2013 07:23 AM, Michael
On 04/16/2013 01:35 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Can we just leave multi-domains out of this discussion for now. IMHO
they are just causing more confusion to an already complicated problem.
Lets focus on just solving the problem of PCI bridges which is what we
actually need right now.
Sure.
On 04/15/2013 05:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:27:03AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 11:46 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/11/2013 07:23 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:03:56AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/10/2013
On 04/15/2013 06:14 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
On 04/15/2013 04:09 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/15/2013 06:29 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:46:15AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/11/2013 07:23 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:03:56AM -0400, Laine
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:35:29PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/15/2013 06:14 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
On 04/15/2013 04:09 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/15/2013 06:29 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:46:15AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/11/2013 07:23 AM, Michael
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:05:40PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/15/2013 05:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:27:03AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 11:46 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/11/2013 07:23 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
it's
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:46:15AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/11/2013 07:23 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:03:56AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/10/2013 05:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
So if we later allowed for mutiple PCI roots, then we'd have
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 11:46 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/11/2013 07:23 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:03:56AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/10/2013 05:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:06:06PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/09/2013
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:27:03AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 11:46 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/11/2013 07:23 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:03:56AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/10/2013 05:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On
On 04/15/2013 04:09 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/15/2013 06:29 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:46:15AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/11/2013 07:23 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:03:56AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/10/2013 05:26 AM,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:59:50AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 10:37:45PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:32:07PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/08/2013 12:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:37:49PM -0400,
On 04/11/2013 07:23 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:03:56AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/10/2013 05:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:06:06PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/09/2013 04:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013
On 04/10/2013 05:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:06:06PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/09/2013 04:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:32:07PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
Actually I do wonder if we should reprent a PCI root as two
controller
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:03:56AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/10/2013 05:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:06:06PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/09/2013 04:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:32:07PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:06:06PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/09/2013 04:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:32:07PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
Actually I do wonder if we should reprent a PCI root as two
controller elements, one representing the actual PCI root
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:32:07PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/08/2013 12:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:37:49PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
I think we're starting to get closer to the concrete problem that's
bothering me. As I understand it (and again - what
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 10:37:45PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:32:07PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/08/2013 12:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:37:49PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
I think we're starting to get closer to the
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 04:26:19PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 12:37 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/05/2013 03:26 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
Sure. I just mean pci bus 0 (hmm, but actually this does point out a
problem with my logic - the same namespace (well,
On 04/09/2013 04:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:32:07PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/08/2013 12:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:37:49PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
I think we're starting to get closer to the concrete problem that's
On 04/05/2013 03:26 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 14:42 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/05/2013 01:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:32:04PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/03/2013 11:50 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
From: liguang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:37:49PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/05/2013 03:26 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
I think we're starting to get closer to the concrete problem that's
bothering me. As I understand it (and again - what I understand has
repeatedly been shown to be incorrect in this
On 04/08/2013 12:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:37:49PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
I think we're starting to get closer to the concrete problem that's
bothering me. As I understand it (and again - what I understand has
repeatedly been shown to be incorrect in this
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:32:07PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/08/2013 12:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:37:49PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
I think we're starting to get closer to the concrete problem that's
bothering me. As I understand it (and again - what
On 04/08/2013 03:37 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:32:07PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/08/2013 12:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:37:49PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
I think we're starting to get closer to the concrete problem that's
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 12:37 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/05/2013 03:26 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 14:42 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/05/2013 01:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:32:04PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/03/2013 11:50 AM,
On 04/05/2013 01:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:32:04PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/03/2013 11:50 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
From: liguang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
add a new controller type, then one can
define a pci-bridge controller like this:
controller
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 14:42 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/05/2013 01:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:32:04PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/03/2013 11:50 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
From: liguang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
add a new controller type, then one can
28 matches
Mail list logo
