Re: [libvirt] pvpanic device should not be automatically included as an internal device

2013-08-02 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 08/02/2013 12:42 AM, Eric Blake wrote: On 08/01/2013 04:23 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Automatic devices with no command line argument have proven to be a nightmare for libvirt as well. Although the just-released libvirt 1.1.1 now supports the element for controlling the command line parameter

Re: [libvirt] pvpanic device should not be automatically included as an internal device

2013-08-01 Thread Eric Blake
On 08/01/2013 04:23 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Automatic devices with no command line argument have proven to be a >> nightmare for libvirt as well. Although the just-released libvirt 1.1.1 >> now supports the element for controlling the command line >> parameters of qemu related to how qemu wil

Re: [libvirt] pvpanic device should not be automatically included as an internal device

2013-08-01 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 08/01/2013 06:26 PM, Eric Blake wrote: On 08/01/2013 08:18 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: On 08/01/13 15:08, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: Hi, The problem with pvpanic being an internal device is that VMs running operating systems without a driver for this device will have problems when qemu will be up