On 02.09.2016 01:11, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Hey,
>
>
> It appears that DEVICE_DELETED only means the VM is done with the
> device but libvirt is interpreting it as QEMU is done with the device.
> Which is correct? Do we need a new event or do we need to fix the
> ordering of this event? An
Hey,
I'm out of my QOM depth, so I'll just beg for help in advance. I
noticed in testing vfio-pci hotunplug that the host seems to be trying
to reclaim the device before QEMU is actually done with it, there's a
very short race where libvirt has seen the DEVICE_DELETED event and
tries to unbind
