On 09/18/2014 05:15 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/18/2014 02:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:24:07PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
Any objections to retiring the v0.9.6-maint branch? After all, we have
already retired the v0.9.11-maint branch
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:24:07PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
Any objections to retiring the v0.9.6-maint branch? After all, we have
already retired the v0.9.11-maint branch
(http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=cd0d348ed), and the
only activity on v0.9.6-maint since 0.9.6.4 was
On 09/18/2014 02:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:24:07PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
Any objections to retiring the v0.9.6-maint branch? After all, we have
already retired the v0.9.11-maint branch
(http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=cd0d348ed), and the
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 09:15:10AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/18/2014 02:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:24:07PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
Any objections to retiring the v0.9.6-maint branch? After all, we have
already retired the v0.9.11-maint branch
On 09/18/2014 09:22 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 09:15:10AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/18/2014 02:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:24:07PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
Any objections to retiring the v0.9.6-maint branch? After all, we have
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:24:07PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
Any objections to retiring the v0.9.6-maint branch? After all, we have
already retired the v0.9.11-maint branch
(http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=cd0d348ed), and the
only activity on v0.9.6-maint since 0.9.6.4 was
Any objections to retiring the v0.9.6-maint branch? After all, we have
already retired the v0.9.11-maint branch
(http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=cd0d348ed), and the
only activity on v0.9.6-maint since 0.9.6.4 was released in January 2013
was the backport of a single CVE fix. The
