On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 16:37 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 06:18:59PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 16:21 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > + Other Linux distros of a similar vintage using GLibC are
> > > expected
> > > +
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 06:18:59PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 16:21 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > While we have CI testing coverage for many platforms, we don't test any
> > non-GLibC based Linux and there are other non-Linux platforms we don't
>
> It's "glibc",
On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 16:21 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> While we have CI testing coverage for many platforms, we don't test any
> non-GLibC based Linux and there are other non-Linux platforms we don't
It's "glibc", not "GLibC".
> officially target, both of which might hit regressions.
>
While we have CI testing coverage for many platforms, we don't test any
non-GLibC based Linux and there are other non-Linux platforms we don't
officially target, both of which might hit regressions.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé
---
docs/news.xml | 19 +++
1 file changed, 19
