Re: [libvirt PATCH] nodedev: report mdev persistence properly

2023-07-19 Thread Boris Fiuczynski
On 7/18/23 9:55 PM, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: Since commit 44a0f2f0, we now query mdevctl for transient (active) mdevs in order to gather attributes for the mdev. Unfortunately, this commit introduced a regression because nodeDeviceUpdateMediatedDevice() assumed that all mdevs returned from mdevctl

Re: [libvirt PATCH] nodedev: report mdev persistence properly

2023-07-18 Thread Michal Prívozník
On 7/18/23 21:55, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: > Since commit 44a0f2f0, we now query mdevctl for transient (active) mdevs > in order to gather attributes for the mdev. Unfortunately, this commit > introduced a regression because nodeDeviceUpdateMediatedDevice() assumed > that all mdevs returned from mde

[libvirt PATCH] nodedev: report mdev persistence properly

2023-07-18 Thread Jonathon Jongsma
Since commit 44a0f2f0, we now query mdevctl for transient (active) mdevs in order to gather attributes for the mdev. Unfortunately, this commit introduced a regression because nodeDeviceUpdateMediatedDevice() assumed that all mdevs returned from mdevctl were actually persistent mdevs but we were us