On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 02:21:00PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 18:12 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 07:05:26PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > My only concern is that our ci/Makefile scaffolding will bitrot now
> > > that it will no long
On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 18:12 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 07:05:26PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > My only concern is that our ci/Makefile scaffolding will bitrot now
> > that it will no longer be exercised directly through CI... Perhaps we
> > could leave a single
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 07:05:26PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 17:04 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > The Fedora rawhide job started failing with the latest container build.
> > Since we now have broad CI coverage on GitLab CI, there's not a strong
> > reason to conti
On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 17:04 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> The Fedora rawhide job started failing with the latest container build.
> Since we now have broad CI coverage on GitLab CI, there's not a strong
> reason to continue using Travis for Linux jobs. Deleting the redundant
> jobs is a better
The Fedora rawhide job started failing with the latest container build.
Since we now have broad CI coverage on GitLab CI, there's not a strong
reason to continue using Travis for Linux jobs. Deleting the redundant
jobs is a better use of time than trying to debug the failure.
Signed-off-by: Daniel
