On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 12:00:03PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 10:41:55AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 08:02:49AM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 06:10:11PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > GSSAPI and
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 10:41:55AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 08:02:49AM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 06:10:11PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > GSSAPI and SCRAM-SHA-256 are the only two SASL mechanisms we
> > > especially want
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 08:02:49AM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 06:10:11PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > GSSAPI and SCRAM-SHA-256 are the only two SASL mechanisms we
> > especially want people to be using. Even the latter is a little
> > questionable due to storing
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 06:10:11PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> GSSAPI and SCRAM-SHA-256 are the only two SASL mechanisms we
> especially want people to be using. Even the latter is a little
> questionable due to storing passwords in cleartext on the server.
At what point of the
GSSAPI and SCRAM-SHA-256 are the only two SASL mechanisms we
especially want people to be using. Even the latter is a little
questionable due to storing passwords in cleartext on the server.
Daniel P. Berrangé (2):
docs: convert auth page into RST format
docs: stop mentioning insecure /
