On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 15:20:18 +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 14:48 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 03:33:53PM +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> > > We currently ignore unknown elements in the CPU XML description,
> > > e.g. with vi=
> > > rsh
> >
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 14:48 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 03:33:53PM +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> > We currently ignore unknown elements in the CPU XML description,
> > e.g. with vi=
> > rsh
> > cpu-compare and hypervisor-cpu-compare. This makes ' > name=3D"...=
> > "
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 03:33:53PM +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> We currently ignore unknown elements in the CPU XML description, e.g. with vi=
> rsh
> cpu-compare and hypervisor-cpu-compare. This makes ' "/>'
> (note the typo in "faeture") semantically identic to ''. No error is re=
> ported.
Th
We currently ignore unknown elements in the CPU XML description, e.g. with vi=
rsh
cpu-compare and hypervisor-cpu-compare. This makes ''
(note the typo in "faeture") semantically identic to ''. No error is re=
ported.
This series adds checks for unrecognized attributes and elements in the "" eleme
