Re: [libvirt PATCH 0/4] storage: support controlling COW attribute for pool

2020-07-23 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 7/20/20 7:33 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: We already support a "nocow" flag for storage volumes, but this requires extra work by the mgmt app or user when creating images on btrfs. We want to "do the right thing" out of the box for btrfs. We achieve this by changint the storage pool code so

Re: [libvirt PATCH 0/4] storage: support controlling COW attribute for pool

2020-07-23 Thread Peter Krempa
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 18:33:18 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote: > We already support a "nocow" flag for storage volumes, but this requires > extra work by the mgmt app or user when creating images on btrfs. We > want to "do the right thing" out of the box for btrfs. > > We achieve this by changint

Re: [libvirt PATCH 0/4] storage: support controlling COW attribute for pool

2020-07-20 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:33 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > We already support a "nocow" flag for storage volumes, but this requires > extra work by the mgmt app or user when creating images on btrfs. We > want to "do the right thing" out of the box for btrfs. > > We achieve this by changint the

[libvirt PATCH 0/4] storage: support controlling COW attribute for pool

2020-07-20 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
We already support a "nocow" flag for storage volumes, but this requires extra work by the mgmt app or user when creating images on btrfs. We want to "do the right thing" out of the box for btrfs. We achieve this by changint the storage pool code so that when creating a storage pool we always try