On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 05:37:47PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 07:55:12PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > The reason for this wrapper is that all job functions introduced in
> > future patches will refer to this one instead of open-coding the same
> > 'meson setup'
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 07:55:12PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> The reason for this wrapper is that all job functions introduced in
> future patches will refer to this one instead of open-coding the same
> 'meson setup' invocation N times. It also prevents 'setup' to be called
> multiple times as
The reason for this wrapper is that all job functions introduced in
future patches will refer to this one instead of open-coding the same
'meson setup' invocation N times. It also prevents 'setup' to be called
multiple times as some future job functions might actually do just that
in a transitive
