Re: [libvirt PATCH 6/6] ci: Enable address and undefined behavior sanitizers

2021-05-04 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 12:50:09PM +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote: > On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 14:16 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 12:01:46PM +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote: > > > meson supports the following sanitizers: "address" (e.g. out-of- > > > bounds > > > memory access,

Re: [libvirt PATCH 6/6] ci: Enable address and undefined behavior sanitizers

2021-05-04 Thread Tim Wiederhake
On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 14:16 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 12:01:46PM +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote: > > meson supports the following sanitizers: "address" (e.g. out-of- > > bounds > > memory access, use-after-free, etc.), "thread" (data races), > > "undefined" > > (e.g. signed

Re: [libvirt PATCH 6/6] ci: Enable address and undefined behavior sanitizers

2021-05-03 Thread Pavel Hrdina
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 12:01:46PM +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote: > meson supports the following sanitizers: "address" (e.g. out-of-bounds > memory access, use-after-free, etc.), "thread" (data races), "undefined" > (e.g. signed integer overflow), and "memory" (use of uninitialized > memory). Note

[libvirt PATCH 6/6] ci: Enable address and undefined behavior sanitizers

2021-05-03 Thread Tim Wiederhake
meson supports the following sanitizers: "address" (e.g. out-of-bounds memory access, use-after-free, etc.), "thread" (data races), "undefined" (e.g. signed integer overflow), and "memory" (use of uninitialized memory). Note that not all sanitizers are supported by all compilers, and that more