On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 09:10:44AM +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-05-07 at 08:36 +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 05:34:55PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 17:08:38 +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> > > > meson supports the following
On Fri, 2021-05-07 at 08:36 +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 05:34:55PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 17:08:38 +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> > > meson supports the following sanitizers: "address" (e.g. out-of-
> > > bounds
> > > memory access,
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 05:34:55PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 17:08:38 +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> > meson supports the following sanitizers: "address" (e.g. out-of-bounds
> > memory access, use-after-free, etc.), "thread" (data races), "undefined"
> > (e.g. signed
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 17:08:38 +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> meson supports the following sanitizers: "address" (e.g. out-of-bounds
> memory access, use-after-free, etc.), "thread" (data races), "undefined"
> (e.g. signed integer overflow), and "memory" (use of uninitialized
> memory). Note
meson supports the following sanitizers: "address" (e.g. out-of-bounds
memory access, use-after-free, etc.), "thread" (data races), "undefined"
(e.g. signed integer overflow), and "memory" (use of uninitialized
memory). Note that not all sanitizers are supported by all compilers,
and that more
