Re: [question] cpumap: why 'mpx' removed from Cooperlake model?

2020-09-01 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 08:50:15 +, Wangxin (Alexander) wrote: > Hi, Jiri > > I just compared the cpu features between the 'x86_Cooperlake.xml ' and > 'x86_Cascadelake-Server.xml', > the feature 'mpx' seems removed from the Cooperlake model. Is there a reason? mpx was not removed from Coope

[question] cpumap: why 'mpx' removed from Cooperlake model?

2020-08-27 Thread Wangxin (Alexander)
Hi, Jiri I just compared the cpu features between the 'x86_Cooperlake.xml ' and 'x86_Cascadelake-Server.xml', the feature 'mpx' seems removed from the Cooperlake model. Is there a reason? And what rules do we follow to add or remove CPU features? Regards, Xin