On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:53:48PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Farkas Levente wrote:
> >> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>> As I mentioned above, doing this in the init script is a bad idea
> >>> because
> >>> it does not interact well with domain autostart. The libvi
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Farkas Levente wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 01:56:10PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
Farkas Levente wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> The save/restore capability is currently only available in the
>> KVM-ified
>>
Farkas Levente wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 01:56:10PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
Farkas Levente wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The save/restore capability is currently only available in the KVM-ified
version of QEMU. We could make it try to save, and failing t
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 01:56:10PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> Farkas Levente wrote:
>>> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The save/restore capability is currently only available in the KVM-ified
version of QEMU. We could make it try to save, and failing that destr
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 01:56:10PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> Farkas Levente wrote:
> > Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> The save/restore capability is currently only available in the KVM-ified
> >> version of QEMU. We could make it try to save, and failing that destroy
> >> the guest. The xendom
Farkas Levente wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:27:00PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 02:29:39PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> hi,
> if i use xen with xendomain it's possible to save and restore guest
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:27:00PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 02:29:39PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
if i use xen with xendomain it's possible to save and restore guest
state. if i use libvirt
