Re: Ping: [PATCH] Qemu: migration: Not bind RAM info with active migration status

2021-01-06 Thread Keqian Zhu
Hi Jiri, On 2021/1/7 2:11, Jiri Denemark wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 21:54:05 +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote: >> On 2021/1/5 21:34, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 09:28:27PM +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote: >> The purpose of QEMU commit 65ace0604551 (migration: add postcopy total

Re: Ping: [PATCH] Qemu: migration: Not bind RAM info with active migration status

2021-01-06 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 21:54:05 +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote: > On 2021/1/5 21:34, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 09:28:27PM +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote: > The purpose of QEMU commit 65ace0604551 (migration: add postcopy total > blocktime into query-migrate) > is to

Re: Ping: [PATCH] Qemu: migration: Not bind RAM info with active migration status

2021-01-05 Thread Keqian Zhu
On 2021/1/5 21:34, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 09:28:27PM +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Thanks for your reply :-) Please see my words below. >> >> On 2021/1/4 19:58, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 04:38:22PM +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote: >

Re: Ping: [PATCH] Qemu: migration: Not bind RAM info with active migration status

2021-01-05 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 09:28:27PM +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for your reply :-) Please see my words below. > > On 2021/1/4 19:58, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 04:38:22PM +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote: > >> Hi Daniel and Jiri, > >> > >> On 2020/12/8 18:31,

Re: Ping: [PATCH] Qemu: migration: Not bind RAM info with active migration status

2021-01-05 Thread Keqian Zhu
Hi Daniel, Thanks for your reply :-) Please see my words below. On 2021/1/4 19:58, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 04:38:22PM +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote: >> Hi Daniel and Jiri, >> >> On 2020/12/8 18:31, Jiri Denemark wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:27:39 +, Daniel P. Be

Re: Ping: [PATCH] Qemu: migration: Not bind RAM info with active migration status

2021-01-04 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 04:38:22PM +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote: > Hi Daniel and Jiri, > > On 2020/12/8 18:31, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:27:39 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:06:25AM +0800, zhukeqian wrote: > >>> > >>> On 2020/12/7 18:38, Danie

Re: Ping: [PATCH] Qemu: migration: Not bind RAM info with active migration status

2020-12-18 Thread Keqian Zhu
Hi Daniel and Jiri, On 2020/12/8 18:31, Jiri Denemark wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:27:39 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:06:25AM +0800, zhukeqian wrote: >>> >>> On 2020/12/7 18:38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 09:55:53AM +0800, zhukeq

Re: Ping: [PATCH] Qemu: migration: Not bind RAM info with active migration status

2020-12-08 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:27:39 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:06:25AM +0800, zhukeqian wrote: > > > > On 2020/12/7 18:38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 09:55:53AM +0800, zhukeqian wrote: > > >> Hi Daniel, > > >> > > >> On 2020/12/4 22:42

Re: Ping: [PATCH] Qemu: migration: Not bind RAM info with active migration status

2020-12-08 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:06:25AM +0800, zhukeqian wrote: > > On 2020/12/7 18:38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 09:55:53AM +0800, zhukeqian wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, > >> > >> On 2020/12/4 22:42, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 12/4/20 5:12 AM, zhukeqian w

Re: Ping: [PATCH] Qemu: migration: Not bind RAM info with active migration status

2020-12-07 Thread zhukeqian
On 2020/12/7 18:38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 09:55:53AM +0800, zhukeqian wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> On 2020/12/4 22:42, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 12/4/20 5:12 AM, zhukeqian wrote: Hi folks, Kindly ping. I found that this patch is not a

Re: Ping: [PATCH] Qemu: migration: Not bind RAM info with active migration status

2020-12-07 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 09:55:53AM +0800, zhukeqian wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 2020/12/4 22:42, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > > > > > > On 12/4/20 5:12 AM, zhukeqian wrote: > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> Kindly ping. I found that this patch is not applied. > >> Has reviewed by Daniel Henrique Barbo

Re: Ping: [PATCH] Qemu: migration: Not bind RAM info with active migration status

2020-12-06 Thread zhukeqian
Hi Daniel, This patch has received ACK from Daniel Henrique Barboza, and waits for your ACK. Do you have any additional suggestion on it? Thanks, Keqian On 2020/12/4 16:12, zhukeqian wrote: > Hi folks, > > Kindly ping. I found that this patch is not applied. > Has reviewed by Daniel Henrique Ba

Re: Ping: [PATCH] Qemu: migration: Not bind RAM info with active migration status

2020-12-06 Thread zhukeqian
Hi Daniel, On 2020/12/4 22:42, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > > > On 12/4/20 5:12 AM, zhukeqian wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Kindly ping. I found that this patch is not applied. >> Has reviewed by Daniel Henrique Barboza and Daniel P. Berrangé. > > > It has my ACK, but looking into the messages

Re: Ping: [PATCH] Qemu: migration: Not bind RAM info with active migration status

2020-12-04 Thread Daniel Henrique Barboza
On 12/4/20 5:12 AM, zhukeqian wrote: Hi folks, Kindly ping. I found that this patch is not applied. Has reviewed by Daniel Henrique Barboza and Daniel P. Berrangé. It has my ACK, but looking into the messages I see that Daniel was inquiring about this being a bug fix or an enhancement (he

Ping: [PATCH] Qemu: migration: Not bind RAM info with active migration status

2020-12-04 Thread zhukeqian
Hi folks, Kindly ping. I found that this patch is not applied. Has reviewed by Daniel Henrique Barboza and Daniel P. Berrangé. Cheers, Keqian On 2020/7/15 14:18, Keqian Zhu wrote: > For that Qemu supports returning incoming migration info since its commit > 65ace0604551 (migration: add postcopy