On 10/26/21 5:06 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 04:49:55PM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
>> On 10/26/21 4:39 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 12:17:06PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
In some cases the worker func running inside the pool may r
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 04:49:55PM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> On 10/26/21 4:39 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 12:17:06PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >> In some cases the worker func running inside the pool may rely on
> >> virIdentity. While worker func could c
On 10/26/21 4:39 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 12:17:06PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> In some cases the worker func running inside the pool may rely on
>> virIdentity. While worker func could check for identity and set
>> one it is not optimal - it may not have acces
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 12:17:06PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> In some cases the worker func running inside the pool may rely on
> virIdentity. While worker func could check for identity and set
> one it is not optimal - it may not have access to the identity of
> the thread creating the pool
