On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:12:28 +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
>
>
> On 21/09/15 19:46, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > Although 0 length block jobs aren't entirely useful, the output of virsh
> > blockjob is empty due to the condition that suppresses the output for
> > migration jobs that did not start.
On 21/09/15 19:46, Peter Krempa wrote:
> Although 0 length block jobs aren't entirely useful, the output of virsh
> blockjob is empty due to the condition that suppresses the output for
> migration jobs that did not start. Since the only place that actually
> uses the condition that suppresses
