Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:36:16PM +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:16:13AM +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 04:08:24PM -0300, Mariano Absatz wrote:
[...]
I modified my VMs
David Lutterkort wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 14:36 +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> > SuSEfirewall2 does not have such a mechanism and TBH I pretty much
> > dislike the idea of allowing applications to inject arbitrary rules.
> > I'd prefer some higher level abstraction so it's left to the
> > fire
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:36:16PM +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> > Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:16:13AM +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> > > > Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 04:08:24PM -0300, Mariano Absatz wrote:
>
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:36:16PM +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:16:13AM +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> > > Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 04:08:24PM -0300, Mariano Absatz wrote:
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > I modified
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 14:36 +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> SuSEfirewall2 does not have such a mechanism and TBH I pretty much
> dislike the idea of allowing applications to inject arbitrary rules.
> I'd prefer some higher level abstraction so it's left to the
> firewall to decide how to translate th
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:16:13AM +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> > Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 04:08:24PM -0300, Mariano Absatz wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > I modified my VMs to use isolated rather than default, but rules keep
> > > > being a
(sorry, Daniel... I had only answered you instead of copying the list also)
Daniel P. Berrange escribió el 01/04/09 09:41:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 04:08:24PM -0300, Mariano Absatz wrote:
>
>> At first I used the 'default' network (with a different rfc1918
>> network)... everything was kinda
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:16:13AM +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 04:08:24PM -0300, Mariano Absatz wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > I modified my VMs to use isolated rather than default, but rules keep
> > > being added to iptables when libvirt-bin is s
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 04:08:24PM -0300, Mariano Absatz wrote:
> > [...]
> > I modified my VMs to use isolated rather than default, but rules keep
> > being added to iptables when libvirt-bin is started.
> >
> > Is there a way to convince libvirt not to add these rule
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 04:08:24PM -0300, Mariano Absatz wrote:
> At first I used the 'default' network (with a different rfc1918
> network)... everything was kinda working until I rebooted the host... at
> that point I lost connectivity between the outside world and the VMs.
> From inside the h
I'm sorry... is this not the right place to ask this kind of
questions? Is there another more user-oriented list or forum?
TIA
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 16:08, Mariano Absatz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to libvirt but not a complete neophite.
>
> I'm using libvirt and kvm in ubuntu with "vmbuilder".
11 matches
Mail list logo