On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 05:10:44PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Btw,
while I got your attention, on a not-really related topic: how do we
feel about adding support for specifying a non-contiguous set of cpus
for a numa node in qemu with the -numa option? I.e., like this, for
example:
Il 29/09/2013 17:10, Borislav Petkov ha scritto:
Btw,
while I got your attention, on a not-really related topic: how do we
feel about adding support for specifying a non-contiguous set of cpus
for a numa node in qemu with the -numa option? I.e., like this, for
example:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:05:10AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I think there are already patches on the list to do that, as part of
the NUMA memory binding series from Wanlong Gao.
Yeah: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-09/msg02833.html
Although I don't see from it how the
Il 30/09/2013 11:49, Borislav Petkov ha scritto:
Yeah: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-09/msg02833.html
Although I don't see from it how the syntax for -cpus will look like
from that QAPI magic except that it is an
+ '*cpus': ['uint16'],
It's -numa
