On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 10:41:26AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 11:39:34AM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:15:59AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 04:53:47PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > I'm also
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 11:39:34AM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:15:59AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 04:53:47PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > I'm also strongly inclined to archive the following:
> > >
> > > * libvirt-cim
> > >
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:15:59AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 04:53:47PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > I'm also strongly inclined to archive the following:
> >
> > * libvirt-cim
> > * libvirt-appdev-guide-python
> > * libvirt-publican
> > *
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 04:53:47PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> I'm also strongly inclined to archive the following:
>
> * libvirt-cim
> * libvirt-appdev-guide-python
> * libvirt-publican
> * libvirt-sandbox
> * libvirt-sandbox-image
> * libvirt-designer
Sounds good to me. It
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:32:42AM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> It's been a while since libvirt-snmp was actively developed. Now it
> receives only libvirt-ci related commits. The code compiles with
> net-snmp-5.9.3 but the freshly released net-snmp-5.9.4 [1] breaks
> compilation [2]. Now,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 08:09:05AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 12:44:16PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 01:26:47PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:32:42AM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> > > > It's been a
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 12:44:16PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 01:26:47PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:32:42AM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> > > It's been a while since libvirt-snmp was actively developed. Now it
> > > receives only
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 01:26:47PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:32:42AM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> > It's been a while since libvirt-snmp was actively developed. Now it
> > receives only libvirt-ci related commits. The code compiles with
> > net-snmp-5.9.3 but the
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:32:42AM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> It's been a while since libvirt-snmp was actively developed. Now it
> receives only libvirt-ci related commits. The code compiles with
> net-snmp-5.9.3 but the freshly released net-snmp-5.9.4 [1] breaks
> compilation [2]. Now,
It's been a while since libvirt-snmp was actively developed. Now it
receives only libvirt-ci related commits. The code compiles with
net-snmp-5.9.3 but the freshly released net-snmp-5.9.4 [1] breaks
compilation [2]. Now, libvirt-snmp has this crazy architecture, where
some sources are manually
10 matches
Mail list logo