Re: live migration is not using secondary interface

2021-01-04 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 12:05:51AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: > One thing to add, though. If you would rather configure the destination in a > way that its hostname resolves to the IP you would prefer for the migration it > might be enough to make this work the simple way around. If you /alw

Re: live migration is not using secondary interface

2020-12-18 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:42:16PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: Am Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:09:45 +0100 schrieb Martin Kletzander : I am guessing you want to `--migrateuri`, possibly with `--listen-address`. Not sure if I really _want_ all these extra knobs. The intent is clear and obvious, the conn

Re: live migration is not using secondary interface

2020-12-18 Thread Olaf Hering
Am Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:09:45 +0100 schrieb Martin Kletzander : > I am guessing you want to `--migrateuri`, possibly with `--listen-address`. Not sure if I really _want_ all these extra knobs. The intent is clear and obvious, the connection needs to go to the specified host and/or IP address. Bu

Re: live migration is not using secondary interface

2020-12-18 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 08:34:29PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: A naive 'virsh migrate --live domU xen+tcp://cross-over-ip' uses the ordinary uplink instead of the requested IP address. According to the documentation an additional option has to be specified to really use the other network interfa

live migration is not using secondary interface

2020-12-16 Thread Olaf Hering
A naive 'virsh migrate --live domU xen+tcp://cross-over-ip' uses the ordinary uplink instead of the requested IP address. According to the documentation an additional option has to be specified to really use the other network interface. However, neither 'tcp://cross-over-ip' nor 'xenmigr:cross-o