Atsushi SAKAI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Jim and Dan
How about this?
src/domain_conf.c|1 +
src/domain_conf.h|6 +++---
src/network_conf.c |1 +
src/qemu_driver.c| 32
src/util.c |4 ++--
src/virsh.c
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 05:59:56PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 10:34:00AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
[..snip..]
I think the only thing missing is extending the descrition in the
documentation
would you mind adding a description in formatdomain.html(.in)
James Morris wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Casey Schaufler wrote:
1.1 Rationale
With increased use of virtualization, one security benefit of
physically separated systems -- strong isolation -- is reduced,
This issue can always be readily resolved by going back to physically
Nope, the monitor is redirected so that libvirt can send commands
to it directly.
Hi,
How are we to ask the monitor to eject a CD-ROM?
Thank you.
Regards,
Rich
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Monday 11 August 2008 19:31, James Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect you misunderstood an important aspect of this in that we are
targeting Linux-based virtualization, where the VMs are running inside
Linux processes. In this case, the isolation depends on DAC in the host,
and the
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 03:58:55PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
In the python bindings, all vir* classes expect to be
passed a virConnect object when instantiated. Before
the storage stuff, these classes were only instantiated
in virConnect methods, so the generator is hardcoded to
pass 'self'
Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
[ Nice long explanation. ]
It'd be great to put that in the code.
lxc_conf.c | 195
lxc_conf.h | 12
lxc_container.c | 39 +--
lxc_container.h |8
lxc_controller.c | 349 +++-
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 03:58:41PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
The patch below implements virStorageVolDelete for volumes
on a disk pool.
The only interesting thing here is that parted wants a
partition number to delete, so we need to peel off the
end of the volume's target path which will
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:52:59AM -0500, Duzenbury, Rich wrote:
Nope, the monitor is redirected so that libvirt can send commands
to it directly.
Hi,
How are we to ask the monitor to eject a CD-ROM?
Use the 'virsh attach-disk' command - it you give it the name of an
existing CDROM
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 03:17:52PM -0400, David Lively wrote:
Hi Folks -
This small patch is a proposed prerequisite for the storage pool
discovery patch I submitted last week.
Daniel B proposed having storage pool discovery return a bunch of XML
storage source elements, rather than
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 03:57:46PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Monday 11 August 2008 19:31, James Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that Casey's idea is that if someone breaks the VM separation then
you
lose it all. For separation based on UML there are obvious benefits to
having
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Russell Coker wrote:
having different labels for processes and files so that if someone cracks the
UML kernel then they end up with just a regular user access on the Linux
host. Which of course they could then try to crack with any of the usual
local-root exploits.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 03:58:41PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
The patch below implements virStorageVolDelete for volumes
on a disk pool.
The only interesting thing here is that parted wants a
partition number to delete, so we need to peel off the
end of the volume's target path which will
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 03:58:55PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
In the python bindings, all vir* classes expect to be
passed a virConnect object when instantiated. Before
the storage stuff, these classes were only instantiated
in virConnect methods, so the generator is hardcoded to
pass 'self'
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:01:16AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Cole Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
parted doesn't seem to want the label 'dos', instead
wanting 'msdos'. Patch is basically s/dos/msdos/
Hi Cole,
This definitely needs to be fixed.
FYI, dos
Hello,
I would like to announce the unifiedSessionsManager(GPL3, including the
claimed inventions), which is based
for Xen on the virsh-tool, but basically uses a different approach. I
guess it could be a quite usable companion
of libvirt for advanced usage and enhanced customizabelity of the
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:17:48PM +1000, James Morris wrote:
4. Design Considerations
4.1 Consensus in preliminary discussion appears to be that adding
MAC to libvirt will be the most effective approach. Support
may then be extended to virsh, virt-manager, oVirt
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do we instead add the info the udev rules, so when /dev is
populated at boot time by udev the device nodes get the desired
initial labelling ? Or do we manually chcon() the device
at the time we boot the VM ?
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:12:07AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:01:16AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Cole Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
parted doesn't seem to want the label 'dos', instead
wanting 'msdos'. Patch is basically
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 09:53:48AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 10:40:30PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Trying to 'build' a disk pool uses 'parted mklabel' which can
prompt for confirmation. Patch adds the '--script' option to
remove the
Another simple question, what is the reasoning about the size field in
this call. I would really be a happy boy if anyone said:
if you put in path == NULL, it will fill your stats structure up to size
interfaces.
...but since this is not the case (yet) what is the reason behind it?
Stefan
--
The LXC patches identified a race condition between fork/exec'ing child
processes and signal handlers.
The process using libvirt can have setup arbitrary signal handlers. In
the libvirtd case we have one attached to SIGCHILD, and the handler writes
to a pipe which is then processeed in the main
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:20:41AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
James Morris wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do we instead add the info the udev rules, so when /dev is
populated at boot time by udev the device nodes get the desired
initial
-Original Message-
From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 4:14 AM
To: Duzenbury, Rich
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [libvirt] Qemu Monitor
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:52:59AM -0500, Duzenbury, Rich wrote:
Nope, the monitor is
James Morris wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do we instead add the info the udev rules, so when /dev is
populated at boot time by udev the device nodes get the desired
initial labelling ? Or do we manually chcon() the device
at the
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:20:41AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
James Morris wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do we instead add the info the udev rules, so when /dev is
populated at boot time by udev the device nodes get the
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:54:23AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:20:41AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
The experimenting I have done has been around labeling of the virt_image
and the process with mcs labels to prevent one process from
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:54:23AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:20:41AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
The experimenting I have done has been around labeling of the virt_image
and the process with mcs labels to
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:16:35AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:54:23AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:20:41AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
The experimenting I have done has been around
Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The re-architecting of the LXC controller/container process relationship
in the previous patch removed the last obstacle to switching over to the
generic domain XML routines. So this patch switches the driver over.
First the vast majority of
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Olivier Deckmyn wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Mads Chr. Olesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lør, 02 08 2008 kl. 23:13 +0200, skrev Olivier Deckmyn:
I would like to be able to choose on a way or another the ip of each
of my VM. As far as I
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Daniel Veillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Olivier Deckmyn wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Mads Chr. Olesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
lør, 02 08 2008 kl. 23:13 +0200, skrev Olivier Deckmyn:
I would like to
I've rewritten virFileLinkPointsTo to be a lot simpler,
and more importantly, it has far fewer failure points.
If anyone wants to preserve the original behavior that
makes it fail when the first parameter does not specify
a symlink, I can add that. The only difference in behavior
would be when
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:18:00PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
I've rewritten virFileLinkPointsTo to be a lot simpler,
and more importantly, it has far fewer failure points.
If anyone wants to preserve the original behavior that
makes it fail when the first parameter does not specify
a
Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:18:00PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
I've rewritten virFileLinkPointsTo to be a lot simpler,
and more importantly, it has far fewer failure points.
If anyone wants to preserve the original behavior that
makes it fail when
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:29:20PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:18:00PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
I've rewritten virFileLinkPointsTo to be a lot simpler,
and more importantly, it has far fewer failure points.
If
Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The LXC patches identified a race condition between fork/exec'ing child
processes and signal handlers.
Looks fine modulo a few details:
diff -r 1dbfb08d365d src/util.c
...
@@ -104,9 +109,23 @@
_virExec(virConnectPtr conn,
const char
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 06:49:59PM +0200, Olivier Deckmyn wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Daniel Veillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
That said I'm working on a new version of the patch which would be adequate
[...]
Once again, if I can do anything to help, I will.
Then please try the
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 03:39:28PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 06:49:59PM +0200, Olivier Deckmyn wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Daniel Veillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
That said I'm working on a new version of the patch which would be
adequate
[...]
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 03:39:28PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 06:49:59PM +0200, Olivier Deckmyn wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Daniel Veillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
That said I'm working on a new version of the patch which would be
adequate
[...]
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 16:22 +0200, Chris Lalancette wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
diff -r c6a3e36cdf54 ext/libvirt/_libvirt.c
--- a/ext/libvirt/_libvirt.c Thu Jul 17 15:24:26 2008 -0700
+++ b/ext/libvirt/_libvirt.c Fri Aug 08 06:04:56 2008 -0400
@@ -637,16 +637,51 @@ VALUE
Hi,
I think html files in docs directory are redundunt.
It is because html file is created by html.in.
May I remove these files?
Or are there any reason about staying these files?
Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 03:58:41PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
The patch below implements virStorageVolDelete for volumes
on a disk pool.
The only interesting thing here is that parted wants a
partition number to delete, so we need to peel off the
end of the
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:12:07AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:01:16AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Cole Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
parted doesn't seem to want the label 'dos', instead
The attached patch updates parthelper to print size
information for a disk device if it doesn't have any
allocated partitions.
The current code starts by requesting the first partition,
then iterating from there. But if there is no first
partition, that whole info reporting thing never happens :)
Specifying a target path when creating a storage
volume has no effect, since volumes only really use
the pool's target path and 'name' field to
establish the volume's target. Logical volumes
expect a target path to be passed, and it can
only cause problems.
The attached patch erases the passed
46 matches
Mail list logo
