On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 06:59:12PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/12/14 18:36, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:34:18AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:41:01 +,
> > > Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2021/12/14 00:4
On 2021/12/14 18:36, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:34:18AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:41:01 +,
Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2021/12/14 00:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:14 +,
Peter Maydell wrote:
KVM on big.little setups
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:21:40 +,
Qu Wenruo wrote:
> On 2021/12/14 17:52, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > The best workaround is to taskset the QEMU process (and I really mean
> > the process, not individual threads) to an homogeneous set of CPUs and
> > be done with it.
>
> Yeah, that's why the cpuset
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:34:18AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:41:01 +,
> Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2021/12/14 00:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:14 +,
> > > Peter Maydell wrote:
> > >>
> > >> KVM on big.little setups is a kern
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:08:29 +,
Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 09:52, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > The best workaround is to taskset the QEMU process (and I really mean
> > the process, not individual threads) to an homogeneous set of CPUs and
> > be done with it.
>
> Agreed. I
On 2021/12/14 17:52, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:16:40 +,
Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2021/12/14 15:53, Michal Prívozník wrote:
On 12/14/21 01:41, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2021/12/14 00:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:14 +,
Peter Maydell wrote:
KVM on b
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 09:52, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> You are still missing the point of how QEMU works:
>
> - QEMU creates a dummy VM with a single vcpu. This can happen on *any*
> CPU.
> - It snapshots the sysregs for this vcpu, and keep them for later
> - It then destroy this VM
> - QEMU then c
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:16:40 +,
Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/12/14 15:53, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> > On 12/14/21 01:41, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2021/12/14 00:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:14 +,
> >>> Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> KVM on
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:41:01 +,
Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/12/14 00:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:14 +,
> > Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>
> >> KVM on big.little setups is a kernel-level question really; I've
> >> cc'd the kvmarm list.
> >
> > Thanks Peter fo
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 03:35:42PM +0800, Liang Cong wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I tried the nfs hard mount, and got the same
> behavior of the soft mount.
> But in the /var/log/message, got nfs server recovery message which is not
> printed when mounting as soft mode.
>
> Dec
On 2021/12/14 15:53, Michal Prívozník wrote:
On 12/14/21 01:41, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2021/12/14 00:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:14 +,
Peter Maydell wrote:
KVM on big.little setups is a kernel-level question really; I've
cc'd the kvmarm list.
Thanks Peter for th
On 12/13/21 17:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:14 +,
> Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> KVM on big.little setups is a kernel-level question really; I've
>> cc'd the kvmarm list.
>
> Thanks Peter for throwing us under the big-little bus! ;-)
>
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 15:02,
12 matches
Mail list logo