rant-libvirt/vagrant-libvirt/issues/1738 summaries
what I'm hoping to do.
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
ore the ownership back to root.
Obviously it might be better if I switched to sending to a named pipe or a
tcp server. Not clear if either of those make it easier for a console to be
accessible while still logging the output.
--
Darragh Bailey
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 at 13:26, Darragh Bailey
wrote:
of returning it to the original user.
Is there any way with libvirt to have the file owned by the user after the
VM is destroyed (doesn't matter if it's owned by root at runtime), when
connecting using qemu:///system?
--
Darragh Bailey
On Mon 16 May 2022, 14:32 Michal Prívozník, wrote:
> On 5/16/22 14:52, Darragh Bailey wrote:
>
> > So perhaps this is less a bug with the loader/nvram XML element handling
> > and more a documentation bug and a possible enhancement that possibly
> > the virDomainDefin
with the loader/nvram XML element handling
and more a documentation bug and a possible enhancement that possibly
the virDomainDefineXMLFlags could consider accepting a flag to verify the
returned domain XML is equivalent as a general fix for those applications
that would find this useful?
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
On Mon 16 May 2022, 10:10 Michal Prívozník, wrote:
> On 5/14/22 21:23, Darragh Bailey wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 00:17, Darragh Bailey > <mailto:daragh.bai...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately trying to call this via ruby-libvirt doesn
Hi,
On Sat, 14 May 2022 at 23:42, Darragh Bailey
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat 14 May 2022, 21:11 Laine Stump, wrote:
>
>> Caveat - I'm completely unfamiliar with ruby and the libvirt-ruby API
>> bindings.
>>
>> If there is a problem that causes the domain
Hi,
On Sat 14 May 2022, 21:11 Laine Stump, wrote:
> Caveat - I'm completely unfamiliar with ruby and the libvirt-ruby API
> bindings.
>
> If there is a problem that causes the domain config to not be updated,
> libvirt will return an error. So I would suspect one of the two things
> is happening
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 00:17, Darragh Bailey
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu 12 May 2022, 21:34 Laine Stump, wrote:
>
>> The virDomainDefineXMLFlags API (and also the older/deprecated
>> virDomainDefineXML API) doesn't require that the domain first be
>> undefine
ssary to pass the flag to
remove on undefine. Hopefully nget to test around some of this later, just
not sure I know enough to ensure I check all behaviours.
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - unknown
>
s to the edit functionality?
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - unknown
11 matches
Mail list logo