On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> [dropping multiple lists; let's just use libvirt-users]
>
> On 02/11/2015 02:45 PM, Edward Young wrote:
>
> > I perform a simple test, but failed.
> >
> > In the source, I create: base <- mid <- active (2 snapshots, the active
> > one is the
[dropping multiple lists; let's just use libvirt-users]
On 02/11/2015 02:45 PM, Edward Young wrote:
> I perform a simple test, but failed.
>
> In the source, I create: base <- mid <- active (2 snapshots, the active
> one is the current one)
> In order to migrate this vm to the destination, I m
Hi Eric,
Please see the blew:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/11/2015 02:07 PM, Edward Young wrote:
> >>> What if this vm has a number of disk-only external snapshots? In the
> >>> current version, how can live migrate this vm?
> >>
> >> Are the snapshots based on sha
On 02/11/2015 02:07 PM, Edward Young wrote:
>>> What if this vm has a number of disk-only external snapshots? In the
>>> current version, how can live migrate this vm?
>>
>> Are the snapshots based on shared storage, or local-only storage?
>>
>
> Yes, I'm talking about the local-only storage.
Oka
Hi Eric,
Thanks for your reply! I have the follow up questions blew.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/11/2015 10:08 AM, Edward Young wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> [probably didn't need to cross-post to quite that wide of an audience,
> oh well]
>
> >
> > I'm investigating th
On 02/11/2015 10:08 AM, Edward Young wrote:
> Hi all,
[probably didn't need to cross-post to quite that wide of an audience,
oh well]
>
> I'm investigating the ways to improve the live migration performance in
> libvirt. I have a question about the vm live storage migration. the
> platform is li
