How about using something like bazaar (http://www.bazaar-vcs.org) to
start a branch off the anonymous CVS/SVN head and then whoever has
patches can put them on a website (hosting the whole branch). If Trans
wants to coordinate pulling in the patches from the other branches and
hosting them, then
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 23:57, Daniel N wrote:
>
> On 8/6/07, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> TRANS wrote:
> Thats the whole reason for a fork... No one can check in...
How about using something like bazaar (http://www.bazaar-vcs.org) to
start a branch off the anon
Thats the whole reason for a fork... No one can check in...
Can't a ruby-forge administrator fix that? Imagine the confusion having
two libxml ruby bindings.
Charlie
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
libxml-devel mailing
On 8/6/07, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> TRANS wrote:
> > So if you all agree, that a fork is a good idea, the question arises:
> > would we be better off starting from scratch? (We can use some of the
> > old code piecemeal as proves useful, of course.) If so, who wants to
> >
TRANS wrote:
So if you all agree, that a fork is a good idea, the question arises:
would we be better off starting from scratch? (We can use some of the
old code piecemeal as proves useful, of course.) If so, who wants to
take up that challenge?
Sorry, but I strongly disagree with a fork and
Hi All,
I'm considering forking the libxml project. Once again I can't get a
hold of Sean Chittenden. So we can't get any new developers on the
project with commit rights. No one, as far as I know, is actively
patching. And no one is at the helm.
I am not a C coder, so really I'm not the best man
