On Wed, 2007-22-08 at 18:21 -0600, Charlie Savage wrote:
>
> Did you try these patches?
>
> http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/libxml-devel/2007-June/000314.html
Hmmm. I can apply the leak2 patch but not the leak1 patch which seems
way more significant:
marc:[libxml]$ patch -p1
signature.asc
Des
On Wed, 2007-22-08 at 18:21 -0600, Charlie Savage wrote:
> Marc,
>
> > I have a reproducible crash using libxml...
> Can you provide the test data? That would be hugely helpful.
I could but it's a bit of a monster, probably timing critical, and
likely to run differently on different platforms.
Marc,
I have a reproducible crash using libxml. I'd like some suggestions on
how I can track this down as it's become a show-stopper for my current
project. This is from a libxml gem created from svn this morning.
Can you provide the test data? That would be hugely helpful.
Also what OS, p
Hi--
These are the people I have as developers on the libxml project.
http://rubyforge.org/project/admin/index.php?group_id=494
The libxml2 fork project has been removed, so I couldn't double check
the developer list. Let me know if II forgot to add you to the list.
I'll try to get the new SV
Folks,
I have a reproducible crash using libxml. I'd like some suggestions on
how I can track this down as it's become a show-stopper for my current
project. This is from a libxml gem created from svn this morning.
I can write and debug C but I'd like some suggestions on what to look
for, and wh
On 8/22/07, Christopher J. Bottaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> copied_node = a_node.copy(true)
> copied_node.find('.//*') # => TypeError: wrong argument type nil (expected
> Data)
>
> What am I doing wrong?
>
> Thank you.
Ok, it looks like the copied node is not associated with any
XML::Document
copied_node = a_node.copy(true)
copied_node.find('.//*') # => TypeError: wrong argument type nil (expected Data)
What am I doing wrong?
Thank you.
___
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-deve
For consistency, stick to the original.
On 8/17/07, TRANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Crazy, crazy. Sean appeared out the blue aether yesterday, and gave me
> admin rights to the original libxml project. So I suppose the fork
> isn't necessary after all. But I'll put it to the community just the
