My analysis leads me to a similar conclusion. Reference counting is
out and there is no need for it. This is my hypothesis:
If things are being freed unintentionally, then there are not enough
ruby to ruby cross-references to maintain integrity during mark and
sweep. A single ruby object hol
If they are to be separate units, I vote for separate modules. A
common virtual release tag can be applied to both to deal with the
synchronization issue.
Dan
On Aug 24, 2007, at 18:39, TRANS wrote:
> On 8/23/07, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> In the second case the version nu
On 8/23/07, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In the second case the version numbers can diverge. So it allows a
> > little more independence between the two libs. The downside is that
> > one has to keep track of which version of libxml to use for a
> > particular version of libxslt. N
