Re: [libxml-devel] Git repository?

2008-08-22 Thread Erik Hollensbe
On Friday 22 August 2008 13:13:21 Trans wrote: > On Aug 22, 2:26 pm, "Dominic Sisneros" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Could you convert this to a git repository.  I would like to try out > > some changes and it makes it easier to fork and pull from git. > Why not just branch the SVN? I can spell o

Re: [libxml-devel] problem with UTF-16 encoding

2007-11-27 Thread Erik Hollensbe
On Nov 27, 2007, at 6:42 AM, Dan Janowski wrote: > Last night I could not see what could BE and LE stand for?! Well, of > course, Big Endian and Little Endian. When there is no lead in to > indicate, the encoding can specify. That's what the byte order mark is for. When we were battling unicode

Re: [libxml-devel] libxml-ruby-0.5.2.0 seg faulting :(

2007-11-16 Thread Erik Hollensbe
On Nov 16, 2007, at 2:17 PM, uncle wrote: > I just upgraded > - feisty to gutsy > - rails 1.2.3 to rails 1.2.5 > - ruby 1.8.5 to 1.8.6 > > Turns out in the sudo gem update all, I also got gems/libxml- > ruby-0.5.2.0 > > Then I started getting random/frequent segfaults in a pretty big rails > app.

Re: [libxml-devel] API docs (was: xpath searching without specifying namespace?)

2007-11-04 Thread Erik Hollensbe
On Nov 4, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Dan Janowski wrote: > I am only aware of one instance ([] operator missing on > XPath::Object) that is an interface change. All the other changes are > intrinsically necessary to fix the bugs in the implementation. What > are you dependent on that has changed? Heh, th

Re: [libxml-devel] API docs (was: xpath searching without specifying namespace?)

2007-11-04 Thread Erik Hollensbe
On Nov 4, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Trans wrote: > On Nov 4, 2007 4:16 AM, mortee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> As a side note, the API Docs link is broken on the new front page, >> taht's why I included this cached copy. > > We need to merge to trunk do we can generate new rdocs. It might be > easier