On 14 mars 09, at 22:28, Charlie Savage wrote:
Changes:
I think you meant 1.1.2 ;)
--
Luc Heinrich - l...@honk-honk.com
___
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
On 26 mars 08, at 13:58, Luc Heinrich wrote:
> 2. in lib/libxml.rb, XML::Attr#to_h is wrong: it should return the
> hash (to_a methods work because Array#<< returns the array itself,
> hash insertions return the inserted value).
Er, sorry, the previous patch was completely bog
XML module, that
I don't know... :)
--
Luc Heinrich - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
[a.name, a.value] end
+inject([]) do |ary,a| ary << [a.name, a.value]; h end
end
def to_s
## end of patch #
--
Luc Heinrich - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
; is called when it
shouldn't be. Or something... :)
--
Luc Heinrich
___
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
libruby.dylib 0x002254f0 call_cfunc + 276
I have a bad feeling about these problems, I don't see why malloc
would crash.
Anyone have an idea ? This is on OS X by the way.
--
Luc Heinrich
___
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-deve
On 7 févr. 08, at 17:27, Luc Heinrich wrote:
> So it seems that simply checking for a NULL 'nodesetval' in
> 'ruby_xml_xpath_object_mark' actually makes sense after all.
Er, nevermind, just ignore me. It seems that this is already fixed in
the subversion repository
On 7 févr. 08, at 13:17, Luc Heinrich wrote:
> I don't know the libxml-ruby code well enough yet to propose a clean
> fix (I'm not sure that simply testing for NULL on nodesetval would be
> enough or appropriate), so if anyone could chime in... :)
After a bit of debugging, i
libruby.dylib 0x00237f80 rb_newobj + 44
...
I don't know the libxml-ruby code well enough yet to propose a clean
fix (I'm not sure that simply testing for NULL on nodesetval would be
enough or appropriate), so if anyone could chime in... :)
Thanks.
--
Luc Heinrich
