-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Pat St. Jean wrote:
On 13 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My main criticism is that some of the language is _oblique_ and should be
phrased as a "permission" rather than an "understanding". The license is meant
to be
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Mark Wells wrote:
I think Bruce mis-stated his point to some extent, but he's right. A
license written in terms of 'understandings' rather than specific
assignment of permissions to the licensee is ambiguous. This makes it
both harder for the end user (as opposed to the
Forrest J. Cavalier III wrote:
In
fact, could you GPL it, and include a notice along the lines of "if you
want to use our trademarks, certification marks, etc. contact
us for a different agreement." That would clean up the open
source license a great deal, I think.
The point is that
3 matches
Mail list logo
