Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Frankly, perhaps what I object to is your self-characterization as
> ``public advocate for the hacker tribe'' (from ``Take My Job,
> Please!''). Based on your public writings, I don't think that you
> advocate my interests or beliefs. Therefore I do not wa
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:51:47 -0400
>From: "Eric S. Raymond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I will argue that I am (necessarily) simplifying, but not
>*over*-simplifying. I offer a precise definition: a model is
>oversimplified when it is unab
Signal 11 writes:
> Quick question -
>
> I'm going to be releasing a program under GPL soon,
> and all the libraries I use are LGPL/GPL. My
> question is - how much of the original distribution
> do I have to include besides the necessary bits I need
> to get my program to compile? Is it safe
Just ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] - he and I are discussing a revival of LPF, but it's
not active at the moment.
Bruce
Given that FSF likes it, I don't have an objection.
Bruce
G'day all.
I thought I'd ask the LPF about the copyright API problem, but the
email address appears not to work (after a week of retrying).
Someone on this list may have an email address which works, since there
must be some overlap between the two interest groups. :-)
The address that I have i
Quick question -
I'm going to be releasing a program under GPL soon,
and all the libraries I use are LGPL/GPL. My
question is - how much of the original distribution
do I have to include besides the necessary bits I need
to get my program to compile? Is it safe to just
grab the files I need, a
This group has been pretty quite on discussions regarding the Alternate
Route Open Source Licenses.
The most encouraging word I've heard is from Seth David Schoen, "That
license is Open Source, but it infringes the FSF's copyright".
We've obtained consent from FSF to base our licenses on theirs.
This group has been pretty quite on discussions regarding the Alternate
Route Open Source Licenses.
The most encouraging word I've heard is from Seth David Schoen, "That
license is Open Source, but it infringes the FSF's copyright".
We've obtained consent from FSF to use the GNU (L)GPL licenses
9 matches
Mail list logo