Thanks for the suggestions. I just sent a copy directly to both Eric and
Richard and will report back if I hear anything.
Scott Hollenbeck (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Network Solutions, Inc. Registry
-Original Message-
From: Jacques Chester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday,
In defence of OSI, it may be that there isn't a real mechanism in place to
handle what is probably a growing flood of requests for license approval. I
received a message from Bruce Perens 2.5 months ago inquiring about our license
(for OpenDesk.com) which we submitted for OSI approval in
In defence of OSI, it may be that there isn't a real mechanism in place to
handle what is probably a growing flood of requests for license approval. I
related, one other reader pointed out the desire of OSI to reasonably
contain the number of, and encourage the use of the
"pre-approved"
I see a lot of people asking on this list why their licenses are not
being approved.
I think I've been on this list since it was created--in some small way
I may have encouraged its creation-- but I don't actually remember
seeing any license receive official OSI approval. I may well have
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
I see a lot of people asking on this list why their licenses are not
being approved.
I have to agree with most if not all of your points. There are getting to be
too many licenses. And most of the ones being submitted are merely minor
modifications
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Chris F Clark wrote:
The list is supposedly part of a process to certify licenses as "open
source". There seems to be no indication that they will ever certify
any new licenses (other than from "very large corporations") as
qualifying. Among the licenses that have not
6 matches
Mail list logo
