At 07:45 PM 1/30/01 -0800, David Johnson wrote:
On Tuesday 30 January 2001 05:23 am, Carol A. Kunze wrote:
Implied warranties on open source software do not make sense because there
is no license income to support granting a warranty.
Why do warranties have to depend on license income? Why
Carol A. Kunze wrote:
The question is, could a supplier provide a free download version of Linux,
and then "sell" printed documentation and installation service together for
$29.95. Based on what I just paid for a book on how to use one of my
software programs that looks like a good deal to
on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 05:23:14AM -0800, Carol A. Kunze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I do not believe implied warranties should apply to open source
software. IAAL, however, IANYL and this is not intended, nor should
it be construed as legal advice.
I will confine my remarks to one point,
on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:58:46PM -0800, Carol A. Kunze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 05:23:14AM -0800, Carol A. Kunze
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Given that open source software does not generate license income,
implying a warranty is not reasonable. Put another
on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 05:23:14AM -0800, Carol A. Kunze
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I do not believe implied warranties should apply to open source
software. IAAL, however, IANYL and this is not intended, nor should
it be construed as legal advice.
I will confine my remarks to one point,
5 matches
Mail list logo
