Re: Is this better for tomsrtbt?

here with bzip2, I get 51,200 bytes for BSD, GPL, and LGPL, tarred. That should be acceptable for a TRB distribution archive, no? It breaks one of the primary design goals, which is that the tarball can be created from the floppy and vice versa in a completely symetrical way, because

RE: Is this better for tomsrtbt?

From: Tom Oehser [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Now, again, as I read it, if I provide an http or ftp directory, which contains 10 files, and one of those has all the licenses, and one is the tarball that makes the floppy, and one is an html file that clearly lists both and explains what they

Re: Is this better for tomsrtbt?

on Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 07:44:56AM -0400, Tom Oehser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: here with bzip2, I get 51,200 bytes for BSD, GPL, and LGPL, tarred. That should be acceptable for a TRB distribution archive, no? It breaks one of the primary design goals, which is that the tarball

Re: Is this better for tomsrtbt?

Ok, thanks. By the way, I have as a result of these discussions made a bunch of enhancements to http://www.toms.net/rb/license.html, which is pretty difficult to accidentally avoid at this point, and which will be on all the mirrors tomorrow. I added a key of what license goes with which file