begin Greg Herlein quotation:
> I feel uncomfortable putting them up on line after he
> clearly took steps to control the distribution of them.
Oh, I was unaware of the latter.
There are other organisations that use copyright-assignment protocols
of some sorts -- for example, Tripwire, Inc. fo
Rick,
You should just ask Brian if you can post them. Write him at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll be happy to send you the templates, but I
think it's the "right thing to do"(tm) to ask the FSF before you
put them on the web.
Greg
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Rick Moen wrote:
> begin Greg Herlein quotation:
Hello,
I would like to hear any comments on this draft
which I have reworked several times in order to
remove flaws I could find.
Purpose:
- small (2k, not 24k)
- similar to LGPL derived works must be under same license
- protection before hotmail-similar licensing
- author can re-license his work
Does there exist a comparison table or matrix that highlights the differences
in most of the open source licenses available out there?
John Cowan wrote:
> The purpose of the Permissive Public License is to achieve
> the effect that people think they have achieved by attempting to
> put their works into the public domain. Given that they cannot directly
> do that, the PPL grants all rights to everybody and disclaims
> all warrant
I can't remember if I have already responded to this. If I have, please
forgive me...
On Thursday 21 June 2001 03:27 am, Stephane Routelous wrote:
> I've read the Q Public License V1.0 . They are saying :
> (ยง6-c)
> If the items are not available to the general public ( Here I understand
> comme
6 matches
Mail list logo
