[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> It still makes a _wonderful_ manifesto, its success speaks for that. But to
> apply it blindly would be foolhardy. I imagine that there is an unbounded set
> of licenses that appear to be OSD-compliant yet are so pernicious in their
> terms as to be outside of th
Hi Forrest,
I think it's possible to create any number of licenses that violate the
spirit of the OSD while following the letter. However, I don't think this
example is one of them. Your #4 doesn't pass OSD #1, which requires that
sale be permitted.
It's been pointed out that:
1. The OSD is not
Bruce,
In September 2001 on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
list, there was a posting referencing the appeal court ruling
of MAI vs Peak. It is the understanding that parts of the
ruling were overturned by the DMCA, (specifically adding
an allowed use at 17 USC 117 (c)) But one of the opinions
in
On 11/13/01 8:43 AM, "Ruslan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i am not into thinking to restrict people who use my code todo something,
> i am thinking about legal issues (or problems, or decisions) person can run
> into, if uses open source code for creating dynamical pages on some site.
>
> shoul
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Gehlker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Open Source" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: Usage of Open Source Licensed software as service
> On 11/9/01 2:12 AM, "Ruslan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Ca
On 11/9/01 2:12 AM, "Ruslan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Can i ask respectfull subcribers of this mailing list one important for
> me(and I hope for others too), question?
>
> I am designing a project, which being developed and licensed under GPL, will
> offer platform for e-commer
Hi all!
Can i ask respectfull subcribers of this mailing list one important for
me(and I hope for others too), question?
I am designing a project, which being developed and licensed under GPL, will
offer platform for e-commerce, for using in commercial environment.
Simply saying, it will be a s
On Friday, 9 November 2001 11:50 AM David Johnson Wrote:
+AD4APg- On Thursday 08 November 2001 08:05 am, Forrest J. Cavalier III wrote:
+AD4APg- +AD4- Can someone point out the OSD violation of a shareware license such
as
+AD4APg- +AD4- the following? I realize it violates the spirit of the OSD
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 03:08:08PM -0500, Russell Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > For better or worse, the GPL is a document copyrighted by the Free
> > Software Foundation and they have not granted permission to make
> > derivative works.
>
>
9 matches
Mail list logo